Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

357 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 357 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Land Acquisition Award Passed Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Directs Compensation Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Award Passed But Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Before Commencement of New Act Entitles Landowners to Higher Compensation Under Section 24(2) Proviso.

6 Jul 2026

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dealt with a writ petition filed by twenty-two landowners whose lands were acquired for the Chinchala Distribut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Challenge to Re-Reservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Failure to Acquire Within Statutory Period. Re-reservation of land for playground and school after expiry of one year from lapsing of earlier reservation held invalid under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

4 Dec 2025

The petitioners, Mukund Mohan Kurunbhatti and Subodh Motichand Bundelchandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Article 226 Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act. Petitioner's land reserved for Public Health Center in Sangamner Development Plan deemed released as Municipal Council failed to acquire within ten years of purchase notice.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Sumanbai Uttam Gadekar, is the owner of land bearing Gut No.179 (Hissa No.1+9B/A) old Survey No.759 situated at Sangamner, District Ah...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse When Possession Has Been Taken, Following Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority That Interprets 'Or' as 'Nor' or 'And' in Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

13 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi and others against a judgment of the Delhi High Court. The High Court had allowed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for Playground Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition for Over Two Decades. The court held that the reservation under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, 1966 lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated despite notice, directing de-reservation.

18 Nov 2022

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No. 362/2B1 at Chalisgaon, challenged the continued reservation of a portion of their land for a 'play-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Notice Issued to Deceased Person Invalid. The court held that a notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued to a person who had died before the notice is invalid, and since possession was not taken and compensation not paid, the acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Vithoba Ravaji Jadhav (since deceased through legal heir Subhash Vithoba Jadhav), owned land Gat No.422/2 at Vadgaon Bhande, Tal. Daun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Reservation Lapse Case Under MRTP Act — Notice Held Valid and Acquisition Steps Inadequate. The court held that the second notice under Section 127 was not premature and the municipality failed to take adequate acquisition steps within 24 months, resulting in lapsing of reservation.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, a partnership firm and joint owner of land in Survey No.7, Mouja Durgavada, Morshi, had its land reserved for shopping centre and garde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project Due to Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Declaration Issued Beyond One-Year Statutory Period Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Rendering Acquisition Proceedings Null and Void.

11 Sep 2015

The petitioners, Baban Homaji Phadtare and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notification d...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

3 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Challenge Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Failure to Provide Personal Hearing Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid. The court held that the mandatory requirement of a personal hearing under Section 5A(2) was not complied with, vitiating the entire acquisition.

1 Nov 2012

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land by the State of Goa for a public purpose. Th...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)