Search Results for "copies rejection"

970 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 970 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Placement of Vital Bail Order. The court held that failure to place the detailed bail order before the Detaining Authority vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

The petitioner, Shobha Dattatray Bodake, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive detention ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Plaint and Amendment in Specific Performance Suit — Consent Decree Not Binding on Third Party. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Limitation Was a Mixed Question of Fact and Law.

The petitioner, Bharat Mulji Khona, was the defendant in a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Fiza Construction Company (respondent no.1) see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State's Refusal to Modify Development Plan Reservation. State's Discretion to Revert Land to Original Reservation Upheld Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Tukaram Mohite (since deceased through legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Prosecution. Court holds that dismissal of suit for default under Order IX Rule 8 CPC is not permissible when the plaintiff's counsel is absent but the defendant is present and ready to proceed.

The appellant, Prabhudayal Pande, filed a First Appeal against an order dated 14.8.2014 passed by the 8th Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Nagpur, in Speci...