Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

512 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award Filed by Non-Guardian of Minor, Remands Claim Petition. Absence of Proper Representation of Minor Vitiated Compromise, and Compensation Was Not Determined as Per Law.

A minor child and her paternal grandmother (as next friend) approached the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 173(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act and Confirms Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute; Appeal Under Section 37 Arises. Single Judge's Order Upholds Award Holding Breach of Contract by Not Supplying DTC Lists

The appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)/Maharashtra State El...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.

The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Judgment in Bunker Supply Dispute Despite Defendant's Challenges. Danish Supreme Court Judgment Held Conclusive Under Section 13 CPC as Defendant Failed to Prove Exceptions, Resulting in Decree for Balance Amount.

The dispute arose from a bunker supply transaction involving the vessel PFS NARAYANA. Dan Bunkering Limited, a Danish company, supplied bunkers to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Directing Indemnity for Depreciation Disallowance. Petitioners Argue that Clause 14 of Lease Agreement Does Not Cover Income Tax Depreciation Denial and Rely on Identical Clause Interpretation in Prior Judgment.

The dispute arose from a lease agreement executed in 1997 between Borosil Glass Works Limited (lessee/petitioner) and Tata Motors Limited (lessor/resp...