Writ Petition No. 2353 of 2013: Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Notices Issued Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Amidst Ownership Dispute
14 Jul 2016...
Search Results for "Title documents"
4379 result(s) found
Found 4379 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Gift Deed Cancellation Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the appellants failed to raise any substantial question of law, and the concurrent findings of the courts below regarding the validity of the gift deed and the plaintiff's lack of title were upheld.
22 Jul 2015The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Smt. Subbamma, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Pr...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute. Plaintiff's Ownership Upheld Based on Concurrent Findings of Fact Under Section 100 CPC.
31 Jul 2018The case involves a second appeal filed by the Union of India and other defendants against the judgment of the appellate court which declared the resp...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Agreement to Sell and Possession Upheld. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 unless perverse or based on no evidence.
8 Jun 2026The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) challenging the concurrent judgments and de...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.
10 May 2013The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction from Airport Land — Petitioner Failed to Establish Title or Possessory Rights Over Land Belonging to Airport Authority of India. The court held that mere possession without proof of title cannot defeat the rights of the true owner, especially when the land is vested in a statutory authority under the Airport Authority of India Act, 1994.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Edward alias Adward Paul Machado, an 82-year-old farmer, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging his eviction from ...
- 127
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.
24 Apr 2015The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Bombay Heard Appeal Against Dismissal of Widow's Partition Suit. Court Examined Claim of Absolute Ownership Under Section 14(1) Hindu Succession Act and Entitlement Under Jamkhandi State Act.
23 Dec 2005The dispute pertained to the joint Hindu family estate of Sir Parshuram Bhau Patwardhan, the erstwhile ruler of Jamkhandi, who died in 1924. His secon...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent and Mandatory Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove possession and title over suit property; courts below correctly held that respondent was in possession and had constructed boundary walls and tin shed.
21 Mar 2018The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction filed by the appellant (original plaintiff) against the respondent...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Possession Restoration and Injunction in a Suit Filed Under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The plaintiffs sought interim restoration of possession and injunction against alienation, alleging forcible dispossession from commercial premises after years of possession and investment.
16 Oct 2025The dispute involved a suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, by Ashapura Options Private Limited and others against Ashapura De...
- 53
