Search Results for "Special Court (POCSO)"

487 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 487 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 354-A IPC, Section 363/511 IPC, and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 26 January 2016, when the informant, a 16-year-old girl, along with her cousin sister, was walking to school for R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Child Witness Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 4, 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Balaji Sarjerao Kamble, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for the rape of a 7-year-old girl under Section 376 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in POCSO Case, Upholds Conviction for Outraging Modesty of Minor. Court Relies on Testimony of 5-Year-Old Victim and Mother, Finds No Ground to Interfere with Trial Court's Judgment Under Section 354 IPC and Section 10 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Kalim Attarli Shaikh, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 10 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Penetration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded, for the offence of rape under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO and Atrocities Act Case — Prima Facie Love Affair Not Rape. The court held that the victim's statement indicated a consensual relationship, and the ingredients of rape and atrocities were not made out.

The applicant, Ashfak s/o Jafar Shaikh, filed a bail application under Section 439 CrPC in connection with Crime No. 179 of 2023 registered at Himayat...