Search Results for "Separate assessment"

2013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference on Hotel Receipt Tax Treatment. Holds that HRT collected is trading receipt but deductible as business expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.

This reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arises from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench, dated 6.2.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Recovery Order Against State Agency for Exceeding 20% Limit Under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Recovery of Rs.16,95,48,869/- for multiple assessment years held illegal as it exceeded the statutory limit of 20% pending appeal.

The petitioner, Bidar Nirmiti Kendra, an agency of the State Government, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Disallowance of Capital Losses and Business Loss on Guarantee Transactions. Tribunal's findings on sham transactions and lack of commercial substance affirmed under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Killick Nixon Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...