Search Results for "POCSO"

532 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 532 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, P. Prakash, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, under Section 6 of the Protection of Children fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in POCSO Case, Upholds 14-Year Sentence for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on Minor. Evidence of Child Victim and Mother Found Credible, Corroborated by Medical and DNA Evidence, Conviction Under Section 6 POCSO Act and Section 342 IPC Affirmed.

The appellant, Kailas Gangaprasad Yadav, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, in POCSO Special Case No. 266 of 2014...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR — Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Guruprasad Daulat Bhalavi, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case 224/2016 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under IPC and POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Chandkha s/o Ibrahimkha Pathan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hinganghat, in Special (Child) Case 1 of 2017 for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO and IPC Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault; Extortion and Criminal Intimidation Charges Sustained Under Sections 384 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Sandip Hariprasad Pande, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Child Protection Case No.63/2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Child Witnesses and Lack of Evidence of Sexual Assault. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bandu s/o Natthuji Raut, was convicted by the Special Judge, Yavatmal, for offences under Sections 451, 376(2)(i)(j)(1) of the Indian P...