Search Results for "Order XXIII"

436 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal in Flat Ownership Dispute Between Appellants and State of Maharashtra, Upholds Single Judge's Order Directing Pursuit of Rights in Competent Forum

The Letters Patent Appeal was filed against the Single Judge's order, which disposed of the petition on grounds that the challenged order did not prej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Adverse Inference and Denial of Cross-Examination in Commercial Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as No Perversity or Arbitrariness Shown Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sivagami N., was the first defendant in a commercial suit (Com.OS 64/2022) pending before the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Prosecution. Court holds that dismissal of suit for default under Order IX Rule 8 CPC is not permissible when the plaintiff's counsel is absent but the defendant is present and ready to proceed.

The appellant, Prabhudayal Pande, filed a First Appeal against an order dated 14.8.2014 passed by the 8th Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Nagpur, in Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...