Search Results for "Mesne profit"

223 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 223 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case — Rent Dispute Not Caste-Based. Allegations of Abusive Language Without Caste Reference Do Not Attract Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015.

The petitioners, owners of a flat in Bangalore, entered into a rental agreement with the second respondent-complainant on 21.06.2018. A dispute arose ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The case involves two regular second appeals filed by the appellants, Chanderakant and Suryakant, against the respondents, who are legal representativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. First Appellate Court's Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Reasoning Renders Judgment Unsustainable.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Beed, in Regular Civi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession in Property Identity Dispute. Plaintiff Established Use of Name Pushpa/Pushpalata Interchangeably and Held to Be True Owner of Flat Under Cooperative Society Share Certificate.

This suit involved a dispute between two sisters-in-law over the ownership of a residential flat in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Reopening Evidence in Possession Suit — Reopening of Evidence After Judgment Reserved Not Permissible Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Without Justifiable Cause.

The petitioners, Siddappa and Lokanna, filed a suit for possession against the respondent in O.S.No.154/2016 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Civil Suit — Appellate Court Exceeded Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC. Remand Without Setting Aside Trial Court's Findings on Merits Is Not Permissible Under Order 41 Rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The present appeal arises from an order of remand passed by the Appellate Court (District Court) in a civil suit. The appellants, who were the origina...