Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Civil Suit — Appellate Court Exceeded Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC. Remand Without Setting Aside Trial Court's Findings on Merits Is Not Permissible Under Order 41 Rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal arises from an order of remand passed by the Appellate Court (District Court) in a civil suit. The appellants, who were the original plaintiffs, had filed a suit for declaration and injunction. The trial court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The respondents, who were the defendants, appealed against the decree. The Appellate Court, without setting aside the findings of the trial court on merits, remanded the matter back to the trial court for fresh adjudication, purportedly under Order 41 Rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The appellants challenged this remand order before the High Court. The High Court examined the scope of Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC, which permits an appellate court to remand a case if the trial court's judgment is reversed in appeal and retrial is necessary. The High Court found that the Appellate Court had not reversed the trial court's findings nor recorded any satisfaction that retrial was required. Instead, the Appellate Court remanded the case merely because it felt that certain issues were not properly framed or evidence was not properly appreciated. The High Court held that such a remand is not permissible under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the remand order, and directed the Appellate Court to decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Remand - Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC - Appellate Court's Power - The question was whether the appellate court's remand order was valid under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC. The High Court held that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by remanding the suit without setting aside the trial court's findings on merits, as the conditions for remand under Order 41 Rule 23-A were not satisfied. (Paras 1, 4-6)

B) Civil Procedure - Remand - Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC - Conditions Precedent - The appellate court must record a finding that the trial court's judgment was reversed in appeal and that retrial is necessary. Mere non-consideration of evidence or improper framing of issues does not automatically justify remand under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of remand passed by the Appellate Court is in consonance with Order 41 Rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the order of remand passed by the Appellate Court, and directed the Appellate Court to decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC
  • Remand
  • Appellate Court's Powers
  • Civil Procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 23

Appeal From Order No.35 of 2022

2022-11-09

Arun R. Pedneker, J.

Mr. Sharad V. Natu

Barku Pundlik Patil (Since Deceased, Through LR's) Chandrakalabai Barku Patil and Others

Subhash Govindrao Pagare and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of remand passed by the Appellate Court in a civil suit.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought to set aside the remand order and restore the appeal before the Appellate Court for decision on merits.

Filing Reason

The Appellate Court remanded the suit without setting aside the trial court's findings, which the appellants contended was beyond the scope of Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC.

Previous Decisions

The trial court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The Appellate Court set aside the decree and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

Issues

Whether the order of remand passed by the Appellate Court is in consonance with Order 41 Rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

Submissions/Arguments

The learned counsel for the appellants argued that the Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction by remanding the suit without reversing the trial court's findings on merits, as required under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC.

Ratio Decidendi

An appellate court can remand a case under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC only if it reverses the trial court's judgment and finds that retrial is necessary. Mere non-consideration of evidence or improper framing of issues does not justify remand without reversing the trial court's findings.

Judgment Excerpts

The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether the order of remand passed by the Appellate Court is in consonance with Order 41 Rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ?

Procedural History

The trial court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants appealed. The Appellate Court remanded the matter. The plaintiffs appealed against the remand order to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 41 Rule 23-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Civil Suit — Appellate Court Exceeded Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC. Remand Without Setting Aside Trial Court's Findings on Merits Is Not Permissible Under Order 41 Rule 23-A of the Code...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Order Rejecting Application Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC as Not Maintainable — Application for Setting Aside Ex Parte Decree Filed Before Appellate Court Not Maintainable Under Order IX Rule...