WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Civil Services Rules 2005"
1416 result(s) found
Found 1416 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Recusal Plea in Habeas Corpus Challenge to Contempt Detention; Holds Embarrassment and Alleged Error Insufficient for Judicial Withdrawal. Non-compliance of court's directions in contempt proceedings led to detention under Articles 129 and 142, and the bench ruled that allegations of bias were unfounded and did not necessitate recusal.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court was seized of a criminal writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the same bench in...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.
21 Jul 2005The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...
- 46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Private Security Agency Against EPF Coverage — Security Guards Held Employees of Agency, Not Clients. The court held that a private security agency providing security guards on payment basis is covered under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, as it renders expert services under G.S.R. 805 dated 17.05.1971.
2 Dec 2020The appellant, M/s. Panther Security Service Private Limited, is a private security agency registered under the Private Security Agencies (Regulation)...
- 1149
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India's Restructuring and Transfer of Employees to Subsidiaries. Transfer of employees to wholly owned subsidiaries held not to be closure or retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
30 Nov -0001The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by various trade unions and associations of employees of Air India Limited challenging...
- 130
Supreme Court
Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.
12 Apr 2012Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.
1 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...
- 428
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Suit by Trustees of Public Charitable Trust for Declaration of Ownership of Suit Properties Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Defendant's Probate-Based Claim to Trust Properties and Alleged Trespass Prompted Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction.
22 Mar 2022The dispute arose between the trustees of the Banaji Limji Agiary Trust, a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act,...
High Court
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.
1 Jul 2024The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...
- 687
