WRIT PETITION NO. 5634 OF 2014
30 Oct 2015Three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a group of workers, including Aayas and Ward Boys, challenging the c...
Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"
592 result(s) found
Found 592 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Retirement Age of Workmen. Workmen who opted for NTC service conditions cannot claim retirement at 60 years under earlier settlement and award.
12 Apr 2006The petitioners, workmen of India United Mills, Mumbai, which was taken over by the National Textile Corporation under the Sick Textiles Undertakings ...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition Against Industrial Court Order Directing Deposit of Pension — Pension Not Awarded in Earlier Labour Court Order, Recovery Application Cannot Expand Scope
22 Aug 2023The Kolhapur Municipal Corporation challenged an order of the Industrial Court directing it to deposit pension payable to the respondent from the date...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Municipal Council Challenging Regularization Order — Temporary Appointment Without Selection Confers No Right to Regularization. Industrial Court's direction to regularize a junior clerk as Tax Inspector set aside as appointment was temporary, without regular selection process, and contrary to recruitment rules under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.
6 May 2024The Pen Municipal Council challenged the Industrial Court's order directing regularization of Respondent No.1 as Tax Inspector. Respondent No.1 was in...
- 476
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Part in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement Upheld but Back Wages Denied. Termination without proper inquiry constituted unfair labour practice under MRTU and PULP Act, but employee's habitual absenteeism justified denial of back wages.
7 Nov 2023The Petitioner, Dattaprasad Narayan Kulkarni, was employed as a Technical Officer with M/s. Auchtel Products Ltd. (formerly Henkel Chemicals (I) Ltd.)...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)
30 Aug 2006Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Company's Petition and Dismisses Workmen's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 Upheld, but Direction for Permanent Status Set Aside for Workmen Not Proving 240 Days Service Under Item 9.
22 Feb 2011The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order of the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) Nos.169 of 1993 and 493 of 1993. The ...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to Regularization of Daily Wage Safai Kamgars. Industrial Court's Order to Confer Permanent Status Upheld as Employees Worked Continuously and Were Denied Benefits Unfairly.
20 Feb 2024The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by the Alibag Municipal Council and its Chief Officer challenging orders of the Industrial Court date...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding That Petitioner Was Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act — Transfer Order Not Challenged on Merits. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the petitioner, including supervision and administrative functions, excluded him from the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
28 Mar 2023The petitioner, Sunil Jagannath Tale, along with 19 other employees, filed a complaint of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Finding of Employer-Employee Relationship in Unfair Labour Practice Case. The court upheld the Industrial Court's decision that fifteen employees were direct employees of the petitioner, based on evidence, and that the union had proved an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act.
13 Jun 2018The case involves a writ petition filed by Sairam Natural Gas And Oil Corporation and another (petitioners) challenging an order of the Industrial Cou...
- 96
