Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jan 2026...
Search Results for "Kerala Buildings Act"
394 result(s) found
Found 394 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Order Regarding Development Licenses and Building Plans. Dispute Centers on Compliance with Town Planning Norms and Apartment Ownership Act.
1 Jan 1970The present batch of civil appeals, with the lead matter arising out of SLP(C) No. 11480 of 2020, originated from the judgment and order dated 10 July...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Dispute. The Petitions Seek to Quash the Tribunal's Order on Grounds of Illegality.
23 Sep 2014This batch of writ petitions arose from proceedings before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT). The petitioners, numerous individuals, challen...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Road Construction in Mumbai — Environmental Clearance Upheld. Court holds that the Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South) is a public utility and the Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA is valid under CRZ Notification, 2011, and EIA Notification, 2006.
26 Apr 2019The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, a resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Environmental Clearance (EC) gra...
- 210
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against Public Servants in Private Complaint for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants is Mandatory for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duty.
2 Jan 2017The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners (accused No.2, 3 and 4) challenging the order dated 13.4.2012 passed by the...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petitions Challenging Goa Public Health (Amendment) Act, 2005 on Grounds of Legislative Competence. The Petitioners Alleged Encroachment on Central Tobacco Act and Occupied Field, Seeking Quashing of State Provisions Banning Tobacco-Containing Food.
7 Jun 2006The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, challenging the con...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Permitting Composite Tenders for Civil and Electrical Works in Contractual Matters. The Court held that the decision in Aurangabad Electrical Contractors Association v. State of Maharashtra was incorrect as it interfered with policy decisions without showing arbitrariness or mala fides.
5 Sep 2019The case arose from a reference by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court questioning the correctness of an earlier decision in Writ Petition No. 3...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.
13 Feb 2018The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...
- 83
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.
1 Feb 2023The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...
- 271
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions by Retailers and Others Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property. The levy of service tax on renting was contested under the Finance Act, 1994, Sections 65–66, on constitutional grounds.
4 Aug 2011The judgment, delivered orally on August 4, 2011, by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court comprising Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Anoop V. Mohta, JJ....
- 32
