Search Results for "Customs tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Customs tariff"

312 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Against Export Tax Exemption for Helium Gas Supplied to ONGC at Mumbai High. Sales to ONGC at Mumbai High Not Exports Under Section 5(1) Central Sales Tax Act as Mumbai High Is Not a Foreign Destination.

9 Jan 2012

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

16 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order in Central Excise Case — Prima Facie Case for Total Waiver Established. Structural glazing, once erected, becomes immovable property and is not excisable under Heading 76.10 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

21 Dec 2011

The appellant, MS Alumayer India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in fabrication and erection of structural glazing. They purchase aluminum angles/profiles, glas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

29 Apr 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Non-Speaking Order of Central Government in Excise Revision and Remands for Fresh Decision. Government's Rejection of Revision Under Section 36 of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, Without Reasons, Held Invalid as It Failed to Provide Judicial Consideration and Disclosure of Materials.

28 Oct 1969

The case arose from a dispute over excise duty liability on a chemical compound produced by the appellant company, which the authorities classified as...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Agent of Vessel Liable as Owner for Port Charges Under Major Port Trusts Act. Court Interprets Section 2(o) to Include Agent, Following Supreme Court Precedent, and Finds Defendants Liable for Deficit After Consignment Sale.

5 Mar 2010

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a statutory corporation, filed a suit for recovery of Rs 3,21,369.45 along with interest, being the defic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Settlement Application. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending settlement application under Customs Act and Central Excise Act before passing order.

27 Jul 2006

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Charles Patrick, challenged the detention order dated 5.5.2006 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines State's Sales Tax Revision Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Orders Quashing Re-assessments Under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Tribunal Had Allowed Taxpayers' Appeals Holding Re-assessments Invalid, Leading the Revenue to File Multiple Revision Petitions.

10 Feb 2023

...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)