High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.
1 Mar 2013...
Search Results for "Collusive Decree"
244 result(s) found
Found 244 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets Prospective vs. Retrospective Operation of Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in Second Appeals. Court Examines Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Born Before and After 2005 Amendment and Whether Division Bench Decision Is Per Incuriam.
14 Aug 2014This matter came before a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a learned Single Judge (R.G. Ketkar, J.) who doubted the correctness...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Appeal Against Rejection of Public Trust Registration. The Court Examines Whether 'Shri Sheriche Mahadev Mandir' Qualifies as a Public Trust Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, Based on Admissions, Management History, and Will Deed.
12 Jul 2016The case arose from an attempt to register 'Shri Sheriche Mahadev Mandir' in Jalna as a public trust under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Th...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeal Against Decree Declaring Suit Darga as Personal Property. The Wakf Board Appealed the First Appellate Court’s Finding that It Failed to Adduce Evidence of Wakf Declaration under Sections 4 and 5 of the Wakf Act, 1995.
28 Feb 2020The appeal arose from a suit for injunction filed by the plaintiffs, who along with defendant No.1 claimed joint ownership and management of the suit ...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Heard a Group of Writ Petitions Challenging Appointment Approvals, Receiver's Authority, and School Tribunal Orders Regarding Reinstatement and Back Wages. The Petitions Involved the Urdu Education Association, Its Employees, and Education Authorities; the Provided Text Does Not Include the Final Decision.
16 Mar 2011The case involves a group of writ petitions filed before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The lead petition (WP 254/1993) was filed by Urdu ...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit — Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession Not Barred by Limitation as Plaintiff Was in Possession Within 12 Years of Filing.
19 Sep 2024The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and possession against the respondents/defendants in O.S.No.7993/2000 before the XVI Add...
- 154
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.
14 Nov 2025The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...
- 435
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal in Title Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property. Declaration of Title Denied as Sale Deed Did Not Contain Approved Layout Plan and Plaintiff Failed to Establish Continuous Possession.
6 Feb 2026The appellant, T.S. Krishnamoorthy, filed an appeal against the dismissal of his suit O.S. No. 13520 of 2010 by the VII Additional Judge, City Civil C...
- 134
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal by Plaintiffs Seeking Declaration of Title by Adverse Possession and Oral Gift; Trial Court Had Partly Decreed Suit Granting Injunction but Denying Declaration. The Appeal Raises the Issue Whether Trial Court Erred in Rejecting the Claim of Adverse Possession Despite Long Possession.
23 Dec 2020The dispute concerned a suit property bearing Sy.No.152/5 measuring 1 acre 4 guntas at Bilekahalli village, Bangalore. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of ...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Partition Suit Appeal — Order I Rule 10 CPC. Subsequent purchaser held to be necessary and proper party to appeal under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
19 Oct 2016The petitioner, Sri Basavaraj @ Madhu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 20.12...
- 98
