Search Results for "trade union possession"

574 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 574 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs BMC to Provide Alternate Premises to Disabled Petitioner After Illegal Demolition of Stall. License Under Section 394 of MMC Act, 1888 Does Not Authorize Structure on Public Land, but Demolition Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Mohd. Sayed Mohd. Salim Nagori Rizvi, a person with 100% hearing disability, filed a writ petition seeking reconstruction of his stall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Challenge to Residential Complex Near Refinery; Upholds Permissions and Finds No Merit in Challenge to D.C. Regulations

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a Government of India enterprise operating...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'THE ASWA' and 'ASĀVA' Marks — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Due to Lack of Phonetic Similarity and Descriptive Nature of Mark.

The appellant, Meher Distilleries Private Limited, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'THE ASWA' under Registration No.2716867 in Class-33 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds rejection of claims for additional payment due to lack of evidence and failure to prove that extra work was ordered by the Railways.

The appellant, M/s. N.N. Constructions, a proprietary concern, filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...