KAHC010792792011_1
18 Dec 2014Background: The dispute centered around two agricultural lands in Kenchanahalli village originally owned by one Siddagirigowda. His first wife Thopamm...
Search Results for "third party purchaser"
1218 result(s) found
Found 1218 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation for Possession Under Order XXI Rule 95 CPC — Starting Point of Limitation is Date Sale Becomes Absolute, Not Date of Sale Certificate. Article 134 of Limitation Act, 1963 governs application under Order XXI Rule 95 CPC, and limitation runs from confirmation of sale under Rule 92(1), not from issuance of sale certificate.
1 Jan 2023The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court dismissing a civil revision application filed by the appellants, who were judgment-debtors. ...
- 161
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Party in Electricity Dues Suit. Addition of Petitioner as Defendant No.2 Upheld Under Order I Rule 10 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Effectuate Decree.
1 Feb 2019The petitioner, M/s Manidhari Air Products, challenged an order of the trial court allowing an application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151...
- 82
High Court
- 45
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019
20 Nov 2019The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....
High Court
- 19
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
26 Oct 2018The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Odisha Forest Development Corporation Ltd. in Tender Dispute — Refund of Deposit Ordered by High Court Set Aside. Forfeiture of Security Deposit Upheld as Per Contract Terms When Writ Petition Withdrawn Without Pressing Challenge.
6 Dec 2019The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the High Court of Orissa. The appellant, Odisha Forest Development Corporat...
- 271
High Court
High Court Quashes FIR Against Landowners in Cheating Case, Holds Civil Dispute Not Criminal. FIR Quashed as Civil Suit for Specific Performance Already Pending; No Criminal Intent Found Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC.
30 Jan 2026The dispute pertained to an agricultural land transaction where the accused persons had entered into a notarized agreement to sell dated 10th March 20...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
24 Apr 2020Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...
- 29
