Search Results for "ownership certificate"

1682 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1682 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Disposes of Appeals Challenging Apportionment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Awarded Entire Compensation to One Party Without Framing Issues or Properly Evaluating Evidence Under Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard three first appeals against the judgment of the Reference Court dated 15.07.2010, which had awarded the entire c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2020

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...