Search Results for "insurance claim rejection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "insurance claim rejection"

506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Subsidy Reimbursement in Solar Mission Case Due to Disputed Questions of Fact. Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Held Inappropriate for Adjudicating Contractual Subsidy Claims Requiring Evidence.

3 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Vehicle in Favour of Petitioner in IPC Offences Case — Vehicle Not Required for Investigation, Magistrate's Rejection Set Aside. Petitioner, a hirer of the vehicle, entitled to release under Section 457 Cr.P.C. despite forensic report of tampered chassis number, as vehicle not needed for investigation.

29 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Santosh Shivaji Vaidya, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the orders of the M...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Death Due to Cardiac Arrest During Employment Held to Be Arising Out of and in Course of Employment. The court set aside the Commissioner's rejection and remanded for fresh adjudication on quantum.

9 Mar 2026

The case involves an appeal by the legal heirs of deceased Manojprashad Kashinath Shahu, a heavy driver employed by Rajeshkumar Dharamshibhai Madhavi....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Cantonment Board's Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute. Limitation period for Section 11 application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from date of refusal to appoint arbitrator, not from request date, under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and no claim certificate does not extinguish arbitration clause.

15 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from three contracts dated 23.09.2000 and 17.09.2001 between Secunderabad Cantonment Board (appellant) and M/s B. Ramachandraiah & S...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Communication Rejecting Coal Import Tender Bid as Non-Responsive for Arbitrary Reasons. Subsidiary Company Cannot be Disqualified Based on Parent Company’s Contract Termination When Tender Conditions Do Not Explicitly Bar Reliance on Parent’s Experience, Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

29 Jan 2024

The petitioner, a subsidiary company engaged in coal import and supply, challenged a communication by the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited rejectin...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018

18 Jun 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Limitation Dispute Between Contractor and Municipal Corporation. Court holds that cause of action for arbitration arose on rejection of claim by Commissioner on 6th January 2000, not on earlier dates, and thus reference was within limitation.

10 Mar 2023

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. R.N. Ghanekar & Co. (Appellant) and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Respondent) against a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Patent Infringement Suit — Director's Authority to Sue Not Barred by Absence of Board Resolution at Plaint Stage. The court held that Order 29 Rule 1 CPC allows a director to sign and verify pleadings, and the absence of a board resolution is not a ground for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC.

2 Sep 2014

The appellant, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the respondent, Celem S.A., in the District Court at Nashik seeking a declaratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Bids in Tender Process for Supply of Medical Equipment. Court upholds rejection of bids as non-responsive for not meeting essential condition of being Original Equipment Manufacturer or authorized representative.

27 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, filed two writ petitions challenging the rejection of their bids by the State of Maharashtra and the Project ...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)