Search Results for "discriminatory levy"

209 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to BDA Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary Notification Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Final Notification Under BDA Act, 1976.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various land owners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition not...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 9 Petition Seeking Renewal of Bank Guarantees Pending Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award. Liquidated Damages Claim in Public Utility Contract Examined for Prima Facie Case in Light of Saw Pipes and Construction & Design Services Precedents.

The proceedings arose from a contract between Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) and Afcons Gunanusa Joint Venture for construction, insta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...