Search Results for "Title documents"

4379 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4379 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession; substantial questions of law not made out.

The appellant, Smt. Sathyamma, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 3.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Two Regular First Appeals from Decrees Granting Declaration and Injunction Over Inam Lands; Question of Civil Court's Jurisdiction Over Re-grant Matters Under Karnataka Certain Inams Abolition Act, 1977 Is Raised.

These two regular first appeals arose from decrees passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ballari, sitting at Siruguppa, in O.S.No.263/2012 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession Upheld. Court holds that the plaintiff's possession over suit plots was established through evidence and the defendants failed to prove their title or prior possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...