Search Results for "Quasi-judicial order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Quasi-judicial order"

207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

11 Aug 2014

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Bill Based on Contract Demand Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Consumer Liable for Minimum Charges Even Without Actual Consumption. The court held that the consumer cannot unilaterally reduce contract demand and must pay minimum charges as per tariff, and Section 126 assessment for unauthorized use is not applicable when billing is based on contract demand.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Vinay Tilokchand Karnavat, a medical practitioner running a hospital in Sillod, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

24 Mar 2017

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

26 Oct 2021

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate of Education Cess on Exported Goods in Central Excise Matter — Education Cess Held to Be Part of Excise Duty for Rebate Purposes Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Section 37B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

29 Apr 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by M/s Ispat Industries Limited challenging an order dated 30 November 2004 passed by the Deputy Commiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BMC Appeal in Property Tax Rateable Value Dispute — Upholds Small Causes Court Order Setting Aside Enhancement for Non-Compliance with MMC Act Sections 162(2) and 167. Notice of Enhancement Not Properly Served and No Personal Hearing Given, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

8 Oct 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika (BMC) against a judgment of the Court of Small Causes at Mumbai in Municipal Appeal No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

29 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...

19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)