Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

591 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 591 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Subsistence Allowance Payment. Subsistence Allowance Payable Only During Suspension Period, Not After Dismissal Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Pravi Auto Swing Pvt Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 21-3-2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanency for Hospital Employee — Industrial Court's Finding of No Continuous Service Upheld. Employee Failed to Establish 240 Days of Work in 12 Months Under Section 5-B of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Kumar Dashrath Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 3 May 2023 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Allowing Union to Lead Evidence in Recognition Dispute. The Court held that the Industrial Court has discretion to permit additional evidence at any stage to effectuate the purpose of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a recognized trade union of employees of Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Pune,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 2012

The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by former employees of National Organic Chemicals Ltd. (NOCIL) against Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. (n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Voluntary Retirement Scheme Acceptance and Payment of Dues Barred Complaint. Acceptance of VRS Benefits Creates Estoppel Against Challenging the Scheme Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Shridhar Tawate, joined Overseas Communications Services (OCS) in September 1975, which was later taken over by Videsh S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...