Search Results for "International commercial arbitration"

648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Petition for Foreign Award Citing Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Prior Section 34 Filing. Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Vests Exclusive Jurisdiction with the Court at Jamkhambalia Where the Section 34 Application Was First Filed.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Ihx (UK) Ltd., a company incorporated in England engaged in shipping, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitration award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petitioner's Application for Appointment of Retired District Judge as Sole Arbitrator Granted Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Notice.

The petitioner, M/s Bafna Udyog, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows MTNL's Appeal Against Arbitration Order in Bond Dispute with Canara Bank. The Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot continue without a written arbitration agreement and without the consent of all necessary parties, specifically CANFINA.

The case involves a dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and Canara Bank regarding bonds issued by MTNL. In 1992, MTNL floated bonds ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of the Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Interpretation of Clauses 96 and 97 of MCGM General Conditions of Contract. The Court Examines Whether Compliance with Clause 96 is a Precondition for Invoking Arbitration under Clause 97.

The appeal arose from an arbitration petition concerning a contractual dispute between a contractor and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.

The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...