Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Not Maintainable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 for Arbitration Matters with Claim Value Less Than One Crore. Appeal against order under Section 10 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is not maintainable as the subject matter of arbitration is not a commercial dispute of specified value.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 122
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Commercial Courts Act, 2015) against an order passed under Section 10 of the said Act in an arbitration matter. The respondent was M/s. SRV Telecom Pvt. Ltd. The parties agreed that the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim in the arbitration was less than one crore rupees. The court examined the roster/assignment of the Division Bench, which specified that appeals under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against orders under Section 10 of the said Act were assigned to this Bench. The court noted that the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (as amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015) came into force on 23.10.2015 and must be read together to achieve expeditious hearing of commercial matters. Section 10 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 deals with jurisdiction in arbitration matters and provides that where the subject matter of an arbitration is a commercial dispute of a Specified Value, all applications or appeals arising out of such arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 shall be heard by the Commercial Division or Commercial Court. The court held that the appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is maintainable only against an order under Section 10 of the said Act, and only if the subject matter of arbitration is a commercial dispute of a Specified Value. Since the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim was less than one crore rupees, the appeal was not maintainable. The court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appeal under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Maintainability - Specified Value - The appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 is maintainable only against an order under Section 10 of the said Act, and only if the subject matter of arbitration is a commercial dispute of a Specified Value (one crore rupees). Where the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim in the arbitration is less than one crore rupees, the appeal is not maintainable. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 is maintainable against an order under Section 10 of the said Act, when the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim in the arbitration is less than one crore rupees.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Appeal under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act
  • 2015 is maintainable only against orders under Section 10 of the said Act
  • and only if the subject matter of arbitration is a commercial dispute of specified value (one crore rupees). Where the aggregate value of claim and counterclaim is less than one crore
  • the appeal is not maintainable.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (04) 49

Appeal No. 79 of 2016 in Arbitration Petition No. 1543 of 2015

2016-04-25

Anoop V. Mohta, A.A. Sayed

Mr. Gobindram D. Talreja I/by Gobindram D. Talreja & Associates for the Appellant, Mr. Subodh Gokhale for the Respondent

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.

M/s. SRV Telecom Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 against an order under Section 10 of the said Act in an arbitration matter.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge an order passed under Section 10 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed the appeal against an order under Section 10 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

Issues

Whether an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is maintainable against an order under Section 10 of the said Act when the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim in the arbitration is less than one crore rupees.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned Counsel for the parties agreed that the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim in the arbitration is less than one crore rupees.

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 is maintainable only against an order under Section 10 of the said Act, and only if the subject matter of arbitration is a commercial dispute of a Specified Value (one crore rupees). Where the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim is less than one crore rupees, the appeal is not maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Counsel appearing for the parties are ad idem that aggregate the value of the claim and counterclaim in the arbitration in question is less than one crore rupees. The Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 ... and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended by The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 ... have been brought into force with effect from 23.10.2015. Section 10 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, is relevant for arbitration matters.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against an order under Section 10 of the said Act. The parties agreed that the aggregate value of the claim and counterclaim in the arbitration was less than one crore rupees. The court considered the roster/assignment of the Division Bench and the relevant provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable.

Acts & Sections

  • Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015: 10, 13
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
  • Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Power Grid Corporation's Appeal Against Writ Order Directing Re-determination of Compensation Under Section 24(1)(a) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Court Holds That Once Award Is Passed and Compensation Received Under 1894 Act, Proce...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Demonstrate Financial Capacity and Conduct Showed La...