Search Results for "General Notice"

11962 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11962 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.

The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.

The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute Based on Agreement to Sell and Possessory Rights. Court Restrains Defendant from Alienating Suit Property or Acting on Assignment Deed, Directs Plaintiff to Pay Accommodation Charges to Tenants.

The dispute pertains to a property known as 'Sharda Niwas' in Goregaon, Mumbai. The plaintiff, Jagdish Harkishan Sharma, claimed to have entered into ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Due to Unexplained Delay of 14 Years and Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner Claiming Tenancy Rights Failed to Seek Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition ...