Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

320 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favour of Plaintiff Sister in Property Dispute Against Brother — Declaration of Ownership and Appointment of Court Receiver Ordered. Plaintiff established prima facie ownership based on MHADA allotment and payment of consideration, leading to interim protection pending suit.

16 Apr 2012

The plaintiff, Shashikiran Ashok Parekh, filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership of a flat originally allotted to her by MHADA in 1974. She paid...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Answers Issues in Suit for Specific Performance and Alternative Reliefs; Vendor Found to Have Breached Obligations by Not Providing Marketable Title and Not Clearing Slum Encumbrance. Illegal Termination of Agreement and Forfeiture of Earnest Declared Invalid as Vendors Failed to Perform Their Reciprocal Covenants Under the Contract.

19 Jul 2010

The plaintiff, a developer firm, entered into an agreement for sale with defendants 1 to 5 (vendors) on 1 November 1979 to purchase land with occupant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Appeal Against Injunction in Redevelopment Dispute — Single Member Cannot Stall Majority Decision. Section 104 CPC read with Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC — Trial court's interim injunction restraining society from redevelopment set aside as it was based on disputed facts and balance of convenience favored the society.

7 May 2021

The appellant, Abhanga Samata Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, is the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

5 Jan 2026

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Development Rights — Interim Injunction Set Aside for Lack of Prima Facie Case. Court holds that a co-operative housing society cannot be restrained from developing its property based on an agreement that was superseded by subsequent consent terms and where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a clear right to specific performance.

5 Jun 2023

The dispute pertains to a property bearing CTS No. 229 and 267, admeasuring 1392.12 sq. meters, situated at Nehru Nagar Housing Board Colony, Kurla (E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Removal of Chairman in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute Over Redevelopment. Managing Committee Resolution and Deputy Registrar's Endorsement Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Bye-Laws Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

12 Jun 2026

The case involves a challenge by Madhavi Vilas Gosavi (Petitioner No.2) and another member (Petitioner No.1) against a resolution of the Managing Comm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Injunction Granted Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Injury Set Aside. The court held that an interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires satisfaction of all three principles: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury.

22 Mar 2021

The appellants, owners of a property, entered into a development agreement with the respondent developer. Disputes arose, and the respondent filed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Rejection of Building Proposal for Non-Compliance with DCR and Non-Refund of Deposit. Court upholds SRA's decision that the proposal was not in conformity with Development Control Regulations and that the deposit was not refundable as per the terms of the Letter of Intent.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Siddharth Constructions, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the deci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Compliance with DCR 2018 — Held that Construction Approved Prior to DCR 2018 is Not Subject to New FSI Restrictions. Vested rights of the petitioners were upheld as the building was substantially completed before the new regulations came into force.

26 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Sai Chintan C.H.S.LTD. and MPR Builders and Developers LLP, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 20.12.2022 is...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)