KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Collusive Decree"
244 result(s) found
Found 244 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Plaintiff Entitled to Vacant Possession as Licensee's Possession Becomes Unlawful After Transfer. The court held that the defendants, who were originally licensees of the previous owner, cannot deny the title of the plaintiff-transferee and must deliver possession.
13 Jul 2010The appellant, Smt. Sarita Gopalkumar Chand, filed a suit for ejectment and vacant possession of suit plot No.253 in CRS III Scheme, NIT Middle Precin...
- 76
High Court
- 36
High Court
- 114
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Daughter-in-Law Against Eviction Under Senior Citizens Act, 2007 — Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Right of Residence Prevails Over Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The court held that the authorities under the Senior Citizens Act, 2007 have no jurisdiction to order eviction of a woman entitled to residence under Section 17 of the PWDV Act, 2005, and the property transfers were collusive to defeat her rights.
11 Dec 2020The present dispute arises out of an application filed by the second and third respondents (parents-in-law of the appellant) under the Maintenance and...
- 623
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Subsequent Purchaser to Join Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Participation as Proper Party. The court held that a subsequent purchaser, though bound by the decree under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, is entitled to be heard in the appeal as a proper party to protect his interest.
27 Feb 2014The petitioner, Shrikrushna Narayan Tupkari, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 19.5.2013 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Akola...
- 111
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings Due to Non-Joinder of Necessary Party and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. The court held that the suit for partition and separate possession was not maintainable without impleading the legal representatives of a deceased co-sharer, and that the appellate court failed to properly re-appreciate the evidence as required under Section 100 CPC.
4 Feb 2013The appellant, Mohd. Munner, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree...
- 62
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Eviction Under Senior Citizens Act and Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings in Family Dispute. Dispute over self-acquired versus ancestral property resolved in favor of retired police officer father under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
12 Jul 2024The legal saga revolved around a residential property in Chandra Layout, Bengaluru, entangled in a web of family disputes between Balasaheb Patil, a r...
- 56
High Court
High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award Filed by Non-Guardian of Minor, Remands Claim Petition. Absence of Proper Representation of Minor Vitiated Compromise, and Compensation Was Not Determined as Per Law.
8 Apr 2026A minor child and her paternal grandmother (as next friend) approached the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 173(1...
- 26
High Court
- 126
