Search Results for "Collector permission"

1745 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1745 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Panchayat Samiti Members for Defying Party Whip in Chairman Election. Disqualification under Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Local Authority (Members Disqualification) Act, 1986 valid as petitioners voted against party candidate despite valid whip.

The petitioners, Tukaram Ganpat Kale and another, were elected as members of Panchayat Samiti, Indapur on 23 February 2007. Respondent No.1, Ankush Ko...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection Process in District Beed Recruitment Due to Malpractices. Selection Committee Has Power to Cancel Vitiated Process Even If Some Candidates Are Innocent.

The petitioners, four individuals who were selected for clerical and Talathi posts in a recruitment process conducted by the District Selection Commit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Writ Petition and Grants Interim Stay on Recovery of Unearned Income. Demand of Rs.26.06 Crores Against Tata Communications Alleged to be Based on Erroneous Finding of Land Transfer Due to Change in Shareholding.

The writ petition was filed by Tata Communications Limited (formerly Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited) challenging the order of the Revenue Minister dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

1] WRIT PETITION NO.2297 of 1996

This batch of writ petitions, filed in 1996, came up before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, on 4 August 2010. The petitioners included shop o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land — Held That No Notice Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Is Required for Unauthorized Occupants and That Encroachment on Public Land Cannot Be Regularized.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different groups of petitioners challenging the demolition of their constructions on land belonging ...