Search Results for "Chief Settlement Commissioner jurisdiction"

370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of RPF Constable for Dispensing with Enquiry Without Sufficient Reasons. Rule 53 of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Requires Recording of Reasons for Dispensing Enquiry.

The petitioner, an ex-Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was dismissed from service by order dated 15 January 2019, dispensing with the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.

The petitioners, Sri T.S. Nataraj, Sri Harsha N., and Smt. N. Seema, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Attachment Notices Against Third-Party Purchaser for Excise Dues of Defaulter. Central Excise Cannot Attach Property Sold Prior to Creation of Dues Without Notice to Purchaser Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Petitioner, M/s Runwal Constructions, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, engaged in construction and developmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Film Release. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Sufficient Similarity Between His Story and the Film 'Jannat 2' to Restrain Its Release.

The appellant, Kapil Chopra, filed a suit against Kunal Deshmukh (director), Vishesh Films India Pvt. Ltd. (producer), and Fox Star Studios Private Li...