Search Results for "Article 348"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Pay Parity for Section Officers in High Court Administration with Mantralaya Staff. The court upheld the principle of parity of pay scales between High Court staff and State Government staff based on a 1965 agreement.

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra F. Rupwate, a Section Officer (Class II) in the office of the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appointment of Government Pleader for Non-Compliance with Statutory Rules. Appointment of Advocate as Government Pleader Set Aside for Violation of Rule 5 of Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Shantreddy and Savithri, both advocates and government pleaders, challenging the appointment of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions for Appointment as Assistant Traffic Inspector Due to Laches and Lack of Enforceable Right. Petitioners failed to challenge termination of appointment orders within reasonable time and could not establish a vested right to the post.

The case involves three writ petitions filed by individuals who were selected for the post of Assistant Traffic Inspector (ATI) in the Kolhapur Munici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Oil Corporation in Octroi Abolition Case. Octroi Demands and Seizure of Depots Quashed as Municipal Council Lacked Authority After 1999 Amendment to Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...