Search Results for "vehicle registration"

2252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Lower Income Assessment. Deceased's contributory negligence assessed at 50% and monthly income reduced from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 10,000 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the insurer, Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which had held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Driver and Owner. Apportionment of Liability Between Owner and Driver Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Prasad Sarodaya, who died in a road ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claims for Rider of Motorcycle Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act. Rider Held Not Entitled to Full Compensation as Liability Limited to Contractual Personal Accident Cover of Rs.1,00,000.

The case involved a fatal motorcycle accident on 08.12.2007 where the rider lost control and collided with a roadside stone, resulting in the death of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Insurer Liable Despite Dishonoured Premium Cheque. Third-Party Compensation Upheld as Insurer Failed to Prove Policy Cancellation Before Accident Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case arises from a claim under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the dependents of deceased Kishor Shende, who died in a motor vehic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimants' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation Dismissed as Deceased Pedestrian Found 50% Contributory to Accident.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 22.05.2011 at about 8.30 p.m. near Mallaghatta Gate, Kunigal Town, Tumkur District. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Minor Pillion Rider. Negligence of Qualis Driver Established as Sole Cause of Accident, Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 27.3.2009 at about 11:40 am at the junction of Hebbal ring road near Bharath Cancer Hospital, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Deceased was a gratuitous passenger in tractor used for transportation of goods; insurer liable to pay compensation despite breach of policy conditions.

The appellant, Kanta @ Baby w/o Dilip Bawankar, filed a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for t...