KAHC010069912016_1
10 Nov 2016...
Search Results for "unconstitutional provisions"
1353 result(s) found
Found 1353 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to be Based on Different Grounds, Causing Prejudice to Assessee.
17 Oct 2025The Petitioner, West India Continental Oils Fats Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, filed a writ petition under Article 22...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to UGC Distance Learning Regulations, Upholds Accreditation and Prior Conventional Mode Requirements. Skill University's Plea for Exemption Directed to Be Considered by UGC.
10 Apr 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the University Grants Commission (Ope...
- 683
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition on Removal from TPE Caution List: Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Guidelines. Court Reserves Orders after Considering Petitioner's Grievance Regarding Inclusion in Caution List Without Proper Forum Evaluation.
24 Feb 2026The petitioner, a chartered engineer and government-approved valuer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India see...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Partnership Dispute — Unregistered Partnership Bar Under Section 69(2A) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Applies to Suit for Accounts and Dissolution. The court held that the trial court must frame and decide the preliminary issue of maintainability under Section 69(2A) before proceeding with the suit.
11 Jul 2011The appeal arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff (Respondent No.1) against the defendants (Appellants) seeking accounts and dissolution of an unreg...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Case Under National Highways Act, 1956. The court upheld landowners' entitlement to solatium and interest, rejecting arguments based on corrected financial burden estimates as insufficient grounds for review.
25 Mar 2026The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a Review Petition filed by the Appellants seeking recall of its earlier order in Tarsem Singh-II, which had dis...
- 1159
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.
10 Nov 2016The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union's Appeal in Customs Duty Refund Suit; Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred Due to Statutory Remedy Under Sea Customs Act. The Court Held That Liability to Pay Customs Duty Is Not a Common Law Liability, and the Act Provides a Complete Machinery for Redress, Impliedly Excluding Civil Court Jurisdiction Unless Exceptional Circumstances Exist.
1 Sep 1969The case concerned a suit for refund of customs duty levied on the import of newsprint. The plaintiff, A.V. Narasimhalu, imported 43 reels of newsprin...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Pensioners' Writ Petitions for Full Pension Benefits Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service Rules. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and cannot be withheld or reduced arbitrarily; respondents directed to pay full pension with interest.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, seeking full pension and pensionary benefits...
- 122
