KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
Search Results for "suo motu registration"
408 result(s) found
Found 408 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail Application Filed Under Section 482 CrPC by Accused in UAPA Case, Holding Extension of Detention and Cognizance by Non-Special Judge Void. Unlawful Extension of Detention Under Section 43-D(2) UAPA and Cognizance by Judge Not Designated Under NIA Act Rendered Proceedings Without Jurisdiction.
1 Dec 2021The matter arose from an FIR initially registered with Vishrambaug Police Station in connection with the Elgar Parishad programme held on 31st Decembe...
- 15
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Under HR&CE Act Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Statutory Appeal Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Renders Writ Petition Not Maintainable.
3 Jan 2025The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a registered society representing Thriswathanthirargal (Sthalathars) cla...
- 12
High Court
Madras High Court Quashes TNPSC Show Cause Notices for Lack of Jurisdiction in Caste Certificate Verification — University, Not TNPSC, Is Competent Authority Under G.O.Ms.No.100
29 Jun 2026The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who were selected by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) for various post...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal in Caste Certificate Validity Case — Confirms Cancellation of Caste Certificate for Failure to Prove Belonging to Scheduled Tribe. The Court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish caste status and that the Scrutiny Committee's findings based on documentary evidence and affinity test are final unless perverse.
6 May 2016The appellant, Vishwas Laxman Bhagat, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which had...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Dispute. Court holds that Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC requires the plaint to be read as a whole and the defence cannot be considered for deciding whether the suit is barred by law.
26 Feb 2013The petitioners, original defendants, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 26.04.2011 passed by the Ci...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against CBI Investigation Order in NSEL Scam Case. Court holds that an applicant not an accused has no locus standi to challenge investigation orders under Section 397 CrPC.
4 Jun 2018The applicant, Jignesh Prakash Shah, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the...
- 276
High Court
High Court of Bombay Quashes Restoration of Execution Proceedings Allowed by Trial Court Under Section 151 CPC. Execution proceedings dismissed for non-prosecution in 1991 restored in 2003 after four-year delay without condonation; court holds inherent powers cannot be exercised when specific provisions under Order 21 Rules 105 and 106 exist and period of limitation has expired.
20 Oct 2010The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dealt with two civil revision applications filed by the judgment debtors challenging an order of the Civil Judg...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Confiscation of Vehicles and Timber Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Lack of Mens Rea and Bona Fide Possession Established. The court held that confiscation under Section 61-A requires proof of intentional violation of the Act, and where the owner had a valid transit pass and permission, the confiscation order was unsustainable.
4 May 2019The petitioners, Syed Burhan Syed Nabi, Sk. Kadir Sk. Vazir, and Mahendra Anil Madipal, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...
- 93
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Final Decree Proceeding — Confirms Scheme of Partition Accepted by Trial Court. Compromise Decree in Earlier RSA Modified Preliminary Decree, and Final Decree Proceeding Properly Implemented the Modified Decree.
26 Sep 2025This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a decree passed in Final Decree Proceeding No. 11/...
- 58
