Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2022 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2022 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation for Agricultural Land. Court Determines Market Value Based on Potential for Horticulture and Nearby Sale Instances, Applying Deductions for Development.

The case pertains to an appeal by the State of Maharashtra and a cross objection by the claimants (legal heirs of the original landowner) against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications for Mahatma Gandhi Memorial, Upholds Validity of Commissioners of Divisions Act. Failure to Specify Instrumentality for Public Purpose Does Not Invalidate Notifications Under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal arose out of land acquisition proceedings initiated for setting up a memorial (Samadhi) to Mahatma Gandhi on the banks of the Sabarmati Riv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...