SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.
16 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "share control"
1526 result(s) found
Found 1526 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Maharashtra Tenancy Act Case — Right to Purchase Not Lost Due to Lack of Knowledge of Landlord's Death. The court held that the limitation period under Section 32-F of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 runs from the date the tenant gains knowledge of the cessation of the landlord's disability, not from the date of cessation itself.
18 Sep 2019The case involves a dispute under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, concerning the right of tenants to purchase agricultural l...
- 502
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Shop; Adverse Possession Claim Rejected Under Limitation Act.
28 Mar 2014The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellant, who is the grand-daughter-in-law of the original plaintiff Gangabai Gilda. The suit property...
- 191
Tribunals
NCLAT Chennai Adjudicates on Condonation of Delay in Company Appeal, Considering Supreme Court's COVID-19 Limitation Extension. The Court examined whether the appeal filed on 28.05.2021 against the 31.01.2020 order approving resolution plan was within time in light of Section 61 IBC and the Supreme Court's orders excluding limitation period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022.
1 Jan 1970The case arose from an appeal against the National Company Law Tribunal order dated 31.01.2020 approving a resolution plan for Vaksh Steels Pvt. Ltd. ...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute — Maintainability Upheld as Dispute Not Between Landlord and Tenant. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court's ruling in Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil, holding that the bar on Letters Patent Appeals under Article 227 applies only to landlord-tenant disputes under the Rent Control Act, 1999.
28 Oct 2010The appellant, Ramchandra Krushnarao Pitale, an 87-year-old pensioner, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.6.2009 pa...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Ejectment Decree Against Licensee in Maharashtra Rent Control Act Case. Licensee Cannot Claim Protection When Original Tenant Is a Government Company Exempted Under Section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
8 Sep 2010The dispute arose from a suit for ejectment filed by the respondent landlords (original plaintiffs) against the applicant licensee and the original te...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Second Appeal and Upholds First Appellate Court’s Decree for Specific Performance in Property Sale Agreement. Failure to Appoint Guardian-ad-Litem for Minor Defendant and Non-Challenge to Subsequent Sale Deeds Are Key Issues Under Section 100 CPC.
20 Sep 2019The Second Appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property. The plaintiff (respondent no.1) claimed that ...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Tender Dispute — Bank of Baroda's Disqualification of Bidder Upheld. Pre-qualification criteria requiring specific experience in printing of magnetic strip and QR code passbooks was not met by the appellant, and the court found no arbitrariness in the evaluation.
16 Jul 2026The appellants, Manipal Technologies Limited (MTL) and its shareholder, filed a writ appeal against an interim order of a Single Judge declining inter...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Final Decree Proceedings in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Discretion to Appoint Commissioner for Division of Property by Metes and Bounds Under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC. The court held that appointment of a Commissioner is a procedural step to assist the court in effecting partition and does not determine rights; parties can file objections to the Commissioner's report.
23 Sep 2015The petitioner, Sri G. Sathyavelu, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the X...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.
1 Aug 2026Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...
- 66
