High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "section 391"
569 result(s) found
Found 569 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Interim Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's power to pass interim award under Section 31(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for admitted liability of Rs.100 crores.
23 Jun 2016The petitioners, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited and Mr. T. Venkatram Reddy, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Jan 2019The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...
- 157
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.
11 Jul 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.
23 Aug 2013The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Dispute — Holds Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Main Contract Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Doctrine of Separability of Arbitration Agreement from Underlying Contract Applied to Refer Parties to ICC Arbitration Despite Alleged Rescission of Share Purchase Agreement by Subsequent MOU.
16 Aug 2013The appeal arises from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a petition filed by the Appellant, Mulheim Pipecoating...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Proceedings — Proceedings Deemed Abated Under Repeal Act Due to Non-Completion of Vesting. Landowners' Successors Entitled to Benefit of Section 3 of ULC Repeal Act, 1999 as Physical Possession Not Taken.
27 Apr 2026The petitioners, Zainulabedin Abdul Razzak Kokni and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging proceedings under the Urba...
- 140
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Foreigners Tribunal Declaration in Assam Nationality Case — Emphasizes Right to Hearing and Burden of Proof Under Section 9 of Foreigners Act, 1946. The Court set aside the ex-parte order of the Tribunal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to be heard.
11 Jul 2024The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the Gauhati High Court's dismissal of a writ petition challenging the Foreigners Tribunal's declaration...
- 788
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.
1 Aug 2026Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...
- 75
