Search Results for "sales tax refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "sales tax refund"

257 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 257 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Mistaken Belief Regarding Audit Requirement Constitutes Genuine Hardship. The court held that the Principal Commissioner erred in rejecting the application without considering the bona fide mistake based on professional advice, and directed condonation of delay.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, RAR Properties, a firm engaged in the business of developing Special Economic Zones, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

20 Jan 2025

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Circulars Denying SEZ Benefits to Trading Units — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Foreign Trade Policy. Court rules that Paragraph 6.11 of Foreign Trade Policy does not restrict SEZ benefits to only manufacturing units, and trading units are entitled to duty-free import of goods for re-export.

3 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Wipro GE Healthcare Private Limited, a trading unit operating within a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), filed writ petitions under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Against Levy of Entertainment Duty on Business Exhibitions. Business-to-business trade shows with restricted entry are not 'entertainment' under Section 2(5) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no duty is leviable under Sections 3 and 4(2).

4 Mar 2013

The Petitioner, The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organizes annual b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Supply Contract Dispute — LD Charges Upheld as Correct and No Refund Granted. The court held that the arbitral award was based on evidence and findings of fact, and no interference was warranted under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Dec 2012

The Petitioner, Bharat Lakhotya, sole proprietor of M/s. Salasar Hanumanji Industries, challenged an arbitral award dated 22 July 2010 under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Land Due to Limitation and Lack of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff's claim for 15% share in property fails as suit filed beyond limitation period and plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform his part of contract.

19 Oct 2012

The plaintiff, Kantilal Vasanji Chheda, filed a suit in 1994 seeking a declaration that an agreement dated 10th April 1981 for purchase of an open plo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Contract for Sale of Aero-Scrap. Clause Explicitly Stipulating Deposit as Earnest Money and Forfeiture on Default Valid Under Sections 64 and 74 of Contract Act, 1872.

28 Oct 1969

The dispute arose from a contract for sale of aero-scrap between the appellants, Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills, and the respondent, Tata Air-Craft Ltd. T...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)