Search Results for "revisional order"

2546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Dismissal of Review in Kulkarni Watan Land Regrant Case. Decides on Rights of Purchaser Versus Successors of Original Watandar Under Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950.

The dispute involved lands bearing Survey Nos. 135 and 144 at Jamda, Jalgaon, originally held as Kulkarni Watan. In 1944, the vendor Ramchandra Tembul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable for Dual Appointment and Forgery in Jharkhand Police Case. Division Bench Erred in Reappreciating Evidence in Departmental Enquiry Where Charges of Fraud and Unauthorised Absence Were Proved on Preponderance of Probabilities.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, which allowed the Letters Patent Appeal file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Cannot Be Invoked After Decree Is Passed. Execution Court Erred in Staying Execution Based on Subsequent Suit Filed by Judgment Debtor After Decree.

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession in O.S. No. 79/2003 (originally O.S. No. 3/1971) against the respondent (judgment de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.228 OF 2004.

The petitioner-original plaintiff filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for recovery of possession of a shop-cum-room, allegin...