High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "compulsory licence"
226 result(s) found
Found 226 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging NEET PG 2016 Answer Key — No Grounds to Interfere with Expert Committee's Determination. Court held that judicial review of answer keys is limited to cases of patent errors and that the expert committee's opinion is entitled to deference unless shown to be perverse.
29 Jul 2016The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the answer keys for the NEET PG 2016 examination. The petitioners, Dr. Ashish Mishra an...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Karnataka addressed writ petitions filed by a physically disabled doctor and her mother seeking refund and compensation from Air India and a travel agent for alleged deficiency in service during a customized tour. The court heard arguments on maintainability under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and the applicability of the Montreal Convention to limit liability for delayed baggage, but the provided judgment text ends before any final decision.
25 Sep 2019The High Court of Karnataka heard two writ petitions filed by a doctor with 75% permanent physical impairment and her elderly mother, seeking refund a...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Acquired Land Due to Alternative Remedy of Civil Suit. Disputed questions of fact regarding impersonation and fraud in drawal of compensation under Section 29(3) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 cannot be adjudicated in writ proceedings.
5 Feb 2014The petitioner, Mrs. Mary John, claimed ownership of 4 acres of land in Sy.No.74/302 of Bandi Kodigenahalli Village, which was acquired under the Karn...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.
22 Apr 2020The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...
- 213
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge Order Setting Aside Administrative Permission for Milk Collection. Fraud Allegation Not Proven as Proposal Was Complete at Time of Application.
2 May 2006The appellant, Subhas Anna Kool, challenged the judgment and order dated 25-10-2005 of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petitio...
- 41
High Court
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 58
