Search Results for "composite premises"

336 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 336 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SRA Scheme for Lack of Public Interest. Court finds that the petition is not a genuine public interest litigation but is filed to further personal interests of the petitioner.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Mumbai Division of Maharashtra Machhimar Kruti Samiti, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Municipal Notice for Trade Licence on Cinema Exhibition Under Karnataka Municipalities Act. Cinema Exhibition Held Exclusively Regulated by Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, Not Subject to Municipal Trade Licence Under Section 256 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.

The dispute originated from a notice issued by the Chief Officer of the City Municipal Council, Chintamani, directing the petitioners, and its proprie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Debtors' Motion to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Consent Decree Dispute. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount by Stipulated Date Renders Debtors Liable for Full Decretal Amount Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The petitioning creditor, Videocon Industries Ltd., filed Suit No. 1891 of 2000 against M/s Akar Laminators and the two judgment debtors, V.T. Seth & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Application to Vacate Section 9 Interim Injunction in Scrap Contract Dispute. Jurisdictional Objection Based on Seat of Arbitration at Bhavnagar, Gujarat, and Allegations of Suppression of Material Facts Raised.

The case involved an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Madras High Court. The applicants, M/s.Gosea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Civil Revision Applications by Tenants in Eviction Proceeding Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenants Raised Issues of Non-Decision of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Applications, Delayed Judgment, and Misinterpretation of Section 15 of the Rent Act.

The Bombay High Court heard two Civil Revision Applications filed by tenants Vasant Mahadeo Gujar and Smt. Khatija Ismail Panhalkar against the common...