Search Results for "bribe"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals by police constables convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe. The com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Hawaldar in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, a Police Hawaldar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Karad for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1000 from the complainant to av...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Appellant, a surveyor, challenged conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act, contending that sanction order was invalid and amount received was legal fees.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Special Case No.67/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sitaram S/o. Baliram Fating, a retired Maintenance City Survey Officer, was convicted by the Special Court (A.C.B.), Nagpur, in Special...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Defective Sanction and Probable Defence. Demand for Amount Held to Be Visit Fees and Medicine Expenses, Not Illegal Gratification, Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

This criminal appeal arises from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a veterinary doctor employed at Panchayat S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, P. Somaraju, was an Assistant Commissioner of Labour in Hyderabad. The complainant, S. Venkat Reddy (PW-1), a licensed labour contracto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Junior Engineer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the demand of bribe, which is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, a Junior Engineer in the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E...