Search Results for "award after expiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "award after expiry"

1376 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1376 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

17 Feb 2016

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Apr 2026

The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...

High Court

High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Bank Employee Terminated Without Proper Inquiry. Termination Based on Criminal Arrest Without Conviction and Without Domestic Inquiry Held Illegal Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

21 Jun 2016

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Ltd., challenged the awards passed by the Labour Court at Kolhapur dated 13th February 2014 (Part-I Award) and 15th May 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

20 Dec 2019

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Over Excess Payments and Blacklisting — Limitation Period Not Barred as Dispute Continued and Final Bill Not Rejected.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves a dispute between Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Board) and Saryu Plastics Pvt. Ltd. (the Company) regarding supply co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhanced Interest Upheld. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application for Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Affirmed.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 7th February 1992, which granted inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Court holds that Reference Court has power to correct arithmetical errors in award under Section 152 CPC and that interest under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is payable from the date of possession.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 24th January 1992 passed by the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, regardless of whether possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Judgment and Order dated 24th February 1992 passed by the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik)...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)