Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Court holds that Reference Court has power to correct arithmetical errors in award under Section 152 CPC and that interest under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is payable from the date of possession.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 24th January 1992 passed by the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) in Land Reference No.35 of 1979. The Reference Court had corrected its earlier award dated 25th October 1982 by directing the State to pay interest at 15% per annum from 14th January 1992 until the entire compensation amount was paid to the claimants or deposited in court. The land in question, bearing Survey No.104/2, was acquired for a public purpose under a notification dated 17th July 1980 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer made an award, against which the claimants sought a reference under Section 18 of the Act. The Reference Court enhanced the market value of the land. However, the original award did not specify the date from which interest under Section 28 of the Act was payable. The claimants filed an application under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for correction of the award, contending that interest should be paid from the date of possession. The Reference Court allowed the application and directed interest at 15% per annum from 14th January 1992 (the date of the correction order) until payment. The State challenged this order, arguing that the Reference Court had no jurisdiction to modify the award after it was passed. The High Court held that the Reference Court had inherent power under Section 152 CPC to correct arithmetical or clerical errors in its award to reflect its true intention. The court noted that the original award had omitted to specify the date from which interest was payable, and the correction was necessary to give effect to the statutory right under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, which mandates interest from the date of possession. The court further held that the interest at 15% per annum was correctly directed from the date of the correction order (14th January 1992) until payment, as the claimants were entitled to interest from the date of possession. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Correction of Award - Section 152 CPC - Reference Court has inherent power to correct arithmetical or clerical errors in its award to reflect the true intention of the court - The court can direct payment of interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 from the date of possession even if not explicitly mentioned in the original award, as it is a statutory right - Held that the correction order was valid and within jurisdiction (Paras 1-10).

B) Land Acquisition - Interest under Section 28 - Date of Possession - Under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, interest is payable from the date of taking possession of the land, not from the date of the award - The Reference Court correctly directed interest at 15% per annum from 14th January 1992 (date of correction order) until payment, as the original award had omitted to specify the date from which interest was payable - Held that the State's appeal was devoid of merit (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Reference Court had jurisdiction to correct its earlier award by directing payment of interest at 15% per annum from the date of possession under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and whether such correction was permissible under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Reference Court had inherent power under Section 152 CPC to correct arithmetical or clerical errors in its award. The direction to pay interest at 15% per annum from 14th January 1992 until payment was valid and in accordance with Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Power of Reference Court to correct arithmetical errors in award under Section 152 CPC
  • Interest under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894 payable from date of possession
  • Applicability of amended Section 28 after 1984 amendment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (05) 40

First Appeal No.591 of 1994

2017-05-09

Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.

Mr. Ameet Palkar, A.G.P., for the Appellant-State. None for the Respondents-Claimants.

The State of Maharashtra (Through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Nashik)

Shankar Shivram Holkar (Since Deceased), Through Legal Heirs: Parvatabai Shankar Holkar, Kailas Shankar Holkar, Pravin Shankar Holkar, Prabhavati Ashok Gaikwad, Nirmala Suryabhan Bhandare, Shashikala Prabhakarrao Kharde, Asha Bhagwan Kadam, Usha Dilip Yaral, Mina Babasaheb Tarkashe

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Reference Court correcting its earlier award to direct payment of interest under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Remedy Sought

The State of Maharashtra sought to set aside the order of the Reference Court dated 24th January 1992 directing payment of interest at 15% per annum from 14th January 1992 until payment.

Filing Reason

The State challenged the Reference Court's jurisdiction to correct its earlier award and the direction to pay interest from a date after the award.

Previous Decisions

The Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) passed an award on 25th October 1982 in Land Reference No.35 of 1979 enhancing compensation. Subsequently, on an application under Section 152 CPC, the court corrected the award on 24th January 1992 to direct interest at 15% per annum from 14th January 1992 until payment.

Issues

Whether the Reference Court had jurisdiction to correct its earlier award under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908? Whether the direction to pay interest at 15% per annum from 14th January 1992 until payment was valid under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894?

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant-State argued that the Reference Court had no jurisdiction to modify the award after it was passed, and the correction order was without authority. The Respondents-Claimants (though not represented) had sought correction of the award to include interest from the date of possession as per Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Ratio Decidendi

The Reference Court has inherent power under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to correct arithmetical or clerical errors in its award to reflect the true intention of the court. Interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is payable from the date of possession of the land, and the court can direct such interest even if the original award omitted to specify the date, as it is a statutory right.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in this Appeal is to the Judgment and Order dated 24th January 1992 passed by the Reference Court of Joint District Judge at Nashik, thereby correcting its Award dated 25th October 1982 in Land Reference No.35 of 1979 and directing the State to pay the interest @ 15% p.a. from 14th January 1992 until the entire compensation amount is paid to the Respondents-Claimants or it is deposited in the Court. The Reference Court has inherent power under Section 152 CPC to correct arithmetical or clerical errors in its award to reflect the true intention of the court.

Procedural History

The land was acquired under Section 4 notification dated 17th July 1980. The Special Land Acquisition Officer made an award. The claimants filed a Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which was decided by the Joint District Judge, Nashik, on 25th October 1982 (Award). The claimants then filed an application under Section 152 CPC for correction of the award to include interest from the date of possession. The Reference Court allowed the application on 24th January 1992, directing interest at 15% per annum from that date until payment. The State filed the present appeal against that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4, Section 18, Section 28
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 152
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Court holds that Reference Court has power to correct arithmetical errors in award under Section 152 CPC and that interest under Section 28 of Land Acq...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was related to deceased ...