Search Results for "address discrepancy"

322 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, P. Somaraju, was an Assistant Commissioner of Labour in Hyderabad. The complainant, S. Venkat Reddy (PW-1), a licensed labour contracto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Unauthorized Construction and Inaction by Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued to MCGM to Act Within Four Weeks. Resident's Locus Standi Upheld Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Sections 351, 354, 355A, 488.

The petitioner, Dr. Rahul Jain, a resident of Borivali West, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Interest on Delayed Payment. The court examined entitlement to interest under Clause 60.8 of the contract and validity of alleged waiver through communications, referencing arbitration provisions and contract law principles.

The dispute arose from a contract awarded by the State of Kerala to the appellants for highway upgradation, executed on 7 November 2002. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Conviction for Employing Child Labour in Tailor Shop. Conviction under Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961 for employing two children below 14 years as helpers upheld.

The petitioner, Sri A M Samiulla, owned a tailor shop named 'Gents Select Tailors' in Gandhinagar, Bangalore. On 27 January 2006, the Senior Labour In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Union of India in Customs Gold Confiscation Case — Confessional Statements Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962 Are Admissible Evidence and Cannot Be Discarded Without Proof of Coercion.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and the Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal was filed by Gangamma, a Supervisor in the Women and Child Welfare Department, challenging her conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. The prosecution failed to prove the age of the victim and the medical evidence contradicted the allegation of rape under Section 376 IPC.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 13.11.1997...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Customs Penalty for Signing Documents in Good Faith — Section 112(a) Customs Act, 1962. Petitioner's limited role and lack of knowledge of illegal importation warranted reduction of penalty from Rs.7.5 lakhs to Rs.1 lakh.

The petitioner, Ashok Chhabildas, a sole proprietor of M/s A.V. Impex, challenged the order of CEGAT dated 19/1/2001 which confirmed the order-in-orig...