KAHC010069912016_1
10 Nov 2016...
Search Results for "World Trade Centre"
238 result(s) found
Found 238 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.
30 Aug 2012The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...
- 220
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
2 Mar 2016The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Petitioners Guilty of Suppression of Facts. Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Rejected as Petitioners Had Received Compensation and Suppressed Earlier Proceedings.
24 Nov 2015The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the acquisition of their lands b...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.
10 Nov 2016The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds State's Power to Appoint CEOs Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Rules, 2014 — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointments Quashed. The court held that the appointments were valid under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Appointment of Chief Executive Officer) Rules, 2014 and the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
27 Dec 2016The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which set ...
- 168
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers Review Petitions on Women's Entry to Sabarimala Temple to Larger Bench — Constitutional Questions on Religious Freedom and Essential Practices Require Authoritative Determination by Seven-Judge Bench. The court identified an apparent conflict between Shirur Mutt and Durgah Committee regarding judicial review of essential religious practices under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
14 Nov 2019The Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 14, 2019, disposed of a batch of review petitions and connected matters arising from the earlier judgm...
- 363
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
9 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...
- 382
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Finding Against Hospital and Doctors for Failure to Conduct ROP Screening on Preterm Baby Leading to Blindness. Compensation Enhanced for Child's Total Blindness Due to Negligent Omission of Mandatory Retinopathy of Prematurity Check-Up.
16 Dec 2019The case arises from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Maharaja Agrasen Hospital and its doctors for failing to conduct mandato...
- 232
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking to Bring Internet Streaming Under Cinematograph Act, 1952. Definition of 'cinematograph' under Section 2(c) does not include transmission through internet.
7 Aug 2019The petitioner, Mr. Padmanabh Shankar, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cour...
- 45
