Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 20 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. Petitioner's challenge to DRT's decision to hear main case after dismissing interlocutory applications fails as review remedy was exhausted and appeal remedy remains available.
12 Dec 2005The petitioner, Gangaram Biseshwar Agrawal, was defendant No. 2 in three recovery suits filed by Canara Bank, Union Bank of India, and State Bank of I...
