Search Results for "Section 376(D)"

260 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Rahul@Mansik Surendrasinh Vaghela, through his friend Mittal Dashrathsinh Parmar, challenged the preventive detention order dated 28.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Material. Detention Authority Failed to Demonstrate How Alleged Activities Affected Public Order as Required Under Section 2(c) of the Act, Making Subjective Satisfaction Illegal.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere criminal antecedents do not justify preventive detention without showing threat to public order.

The petitioner, Sahilkhan @ Mota Maniyar Rashidahemad Pathan, through his mother Sama Sultana Rashidahemad Pathan, challenged a preventive detention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Jigar @ Lalo Pravinchandra Purani, through his mother Madhuben Pravinchandra Purani, challenged a preventive detention order dated 04....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Appellants for Gang Rape Under Section 376D IPC — Sentence of 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment Confirmed. Testimony of Minor Victim Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Despite Minor Inconsistencies.

The appellants, Vinod Baku Jadhao and Sunil Raju Jadhao, were convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for the offence of gang rape under Section 376D o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Nirmalsing Rajendrasing Tank Chikhligar, through his father Rajendrasing Ratansing Chikhligar, challenged a preventive detention order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The present petition was filed by Sunny S/o Rameshbhai Lallubhai Desai through his father Rameshbhai Lallubhai Desai challenging the legality and vali...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanically without application of mind.

The petitioner, Arshit @ Lembo Najabhai Sankhat, through his father Najabhai Karshanbhai Sankhat, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive...