Search Results for "Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999"

671 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 671 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation of Delhi's Petition Seeking Mandamus Against State of Maharashtra to Execute Distress Warrants. Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Has No Extra-Territorial Application, Hence No Duty on Maharashtra Authorities.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), a statutory body under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, filed a writ petition in the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Appeals Against Dismissal of Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Redevelopment Dispute. Non-Signatories to Development Agreement Cannot Be Directed to Vacate Premises Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as They Are Not Bound by Agreement.

The matter arose from a redevelopment dispute concerning Poddar Apartment, a building comprising ground plus four upper floors with 30 flats, 44 shops...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...