Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

547 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 547 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to CIDCO's Demand for Premium on Additional FSI in Waluj Growth Centre; Petitioners Argue Sanctioned DCR Provides Basic FSI of 1.5 and No Premium is Chargeable, While CIDCO Contends Unauthorized Construction and Suppression of Facts

The petitioners, three individuals engaged in business, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging communication...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Reservation for Public Garden in Kolhapur Development Plan. Reservation under Section 22 of MRTP Act, 1966 for public garden upheld as valid and not arbitrary, rejecting claims of delay and hardship.

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a writ petition filed by 15 members of the Jamsandekar family and a public interest litigation filed by P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.

The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Determines Reference on Maintainability of Section 18 Reference Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After 2013 Act Came into Force. Key Issue Involves Whether Landowners Can Seek Enhancement Under Old Act When Award Passed After Commencement of 2013 Act.

Background: The matter arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Pune Municipal Corporation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A no...